Blackjack Risk of Ruin. It’s wise to know the risks of losing set amounts of money when playing Blackjack games.The more you know about the risks you are taking at the table, the easier it is to control the amount you can potentially lose (or hopefully win) from one session to the next. Risk Of Ruin Blackjack Calculator. Risk of ruin blackjack calculator Here, risk of ruin is defined as the probability.Learn how much money is needed to make money with card counting and how many betting units are recommended for your blackjack bankroll to keep risk low?Bankroll Blackjack Calculator bankroll blackjack calculator Bankroll Blackjack Calculator bankroll.

What Is Risk of Ruin?

Risk of ruin is the probability of an individual losing substantial amounts of money through investing, trading or gambling, to the point where it is no longer possible to recover the losses or continue. Risk of ruin is typically calculated as a loss probability, also known as the 'probability of ruin.'

Understanding the Risk of Ruin

Risk of ruin can be identified through advanced financial modeling and expressed as a probability. The complexity of the financial modeling methodology involved in calculating risk of ruin will typically depend on the number and variety of investments involved in a comprehensive trading portfolio. In basic terms, the risk of ruin in gambling and investing is not so different as it depends on how many bets (investments) are placed and how much capital there is to cushion probable losses. The main difference being that investments are not zero-sum bets. Each investment has different risk profiles and payout probabilities, with some risking all capital and some guaranteeing a return of principle regardless of performance.

Controlling the Risk of Ruin

The concept of diversification was developed, in part, to mitigate the risk of ruin. Multi asset portfolios can be extremely difficult to build risk management strategies for because of the infinite number of scenarios involved with investments across a portfolio. Some investments, such as bonds and funds, have a great deal of historical data to allow for extensive analysis of the probability given a wide range of parameters. Others like custom derivatives are often unique and sometimes hard to properly analyze for exposure. On top of this, there are always the black swan events that can upend even the most complex risk management model. For this reason, most investors rely on asset allocation models that invest a base level of capital in risk-free or very low risk assets while taking higher risk bets in other areas of a portfolio.

Risk management programs can be customized to the investor and type of investments involved. Risk management programs will vary across disciplines with some standard practices in the financial industry developed for investment management, insurance, venture capital and so on. Institutional risk management is typically required by regulation for all types of investing scenarios in the financial industry and best practices such as actively monitoring areas like counterparty risk are widely used. Personal risk management in an investment portfolio, however, is often overlooked or miscalculated.

The goal of every card counter is not playing to simply get complimentary services. Instead, he/she plays the game for hard cash and in order to accomplish such a goal, he/she needs a thorough knowledge of risk of ruin. He/she needs to identify his/her tolerance to risk and to devise an appropriate betting plan, with which to meet or overcome that risk.

Risk of ruin and bankroll size

A card counter will usually evaluate risk of ruin as a percentage. In simple words, it shows how often a player can expect to lose his/her entire bankroll in a certain number of hands. A risk of ruin of 10% means that the player has one chance in ten to vanquish his/her entire bankroll, if he/she does not introduce a change in his/her bet size.

When it comes to a total playing bankroll, every card counter needs to think about what could happen in a longer term. The counter needs to set a starting bankroll, exposed to a risk of ruin he/she feels comfortable with. Next, he/she needs to bolster that bankroll with earnings until a point is reached, where his/her risk tolerance and earning objectives are met.

What we should note is that there is a major issue when evaluating risk of ruin and it boils down to that no player will make the same play decisions in the same game all of the time. No one is immune to errors as well as no one will probably play one and the same type of game forever. Risk of ruin for one and the same bankroll is, to a great extent, dependent on the games one chooses to play. In addition, if one uses cover plays and cover bets, then the expected value of the game and the standard deviation figure will be changed, while they both are key elements to risk of ruin evaluation.

Different players will usually have different notions about the acceptable risk of ruin. In case a player uses a bankroll, which can be supplied with funds on a regular basis, he/she may be willing to expose it to a bit higher risk of ruin, compared to, for example, another player whose bankroll cannot be replenished that easily. Professionals, who make a living from blackjack, will usually prefer the smallest risk of ruin possible (such as 1% or even less).

If a non-professional player uses 5% risk of ruin as an acceptable risk level, in order to size his/her total bankroll and betting units, he/she needs to use the amount of his/her largest bet in the calculation. In case his/her largest bet is $100 and he/she uses a bet spread of 1-4 in the game, then his/her base betting unit may be $25. In another game, where the recommended bet spread is 1-10, the player will need to re-adjust his/her base betting unit to about 1/10 of his/her highest bet ($100), which will result in $10. By using this method, the player's risk of ruin will not be changed considerably.

Blackjack Risk Of Ruin Calculator

£/€/C$88

100% up to

$/£/€200

+ 200 Spins

100% up to

$/£/€100

100% up to

Risk Of Ruin Formula

$/£/€/C$200

+ 50 Spins

Blackjack Risk Of Ruin

Standard deviation and how it affects one’s bankroll

Probability Of Ruin Formula

For card counters who use a bet spread, the standard deviation figure will come in a number of variations. If the player increases the size of his/her bet spread, the standard deviation per hand will increase as well. In case the card counter uses a huge bet spread (1-12 units, for example) in a game, the standard deviation could exceed a value of 3. At the same time, when he/she employs back-counting (or Wonging, which is a play style we shall discuss later), the standard deviation could rise even above a value of 5. Such variations of the standard deviation could cause a counter to be either well above or well below the expected level of performance during any set period of time he/she spends playing. It should not be a surprise, according to experts, if a counter finds himself/herself below his/her best performance ever recorded, most of the time. At a later moment, he/she may reach a new all-time high and after that he/she may again find himself/herself below it. In case he/she uses a proper selection of games and employs sound play strategies, he/she will be able to bolster his/her bankroll, but the growth rate will probably be uneven. In other words, the counter may discover that he steps three times forward and two times backward all of the time.

Players who employ bet spreads will probably have a hard time evaluating the standard deviation per hand without the use of a computer program. The standard deviation per hand is influenced by an array of factors such as the rules of the game, the level of penetration, the number of decks, the bet spread and the betting ramp. The approximate standard deviation (SD) figures for the play-all style approach with ordinary bet spreads are as follows: 1. For a single-deck game with a bet spread of 1-4, the SD is 2.35; 2. For a double-deck game with a bet spread of 1-8 units, the SD is 3.00; 3. For a four-deck game with a bet spread of 1-8 units, the SD is 3.50; 4. For a six-deck game with a bet spread of 1-12 units, the SD is 3.75; 5. For an eight-deck game with a bet spread of 1-12 units, the SD is 3.50.